Ryan at Dead Parrot Society suggests that the guys at Power Line, and others who made these accusations don't know what they are talking about:
Do these writers really believe their characterizations of how the stringer got his shots? I can't imagine they do, not in a day where a telephoto lens and a professional crop bring you right into a photo's face.
Here, compare these two versions of the same picture, both carried on Yahoo's feed of news photos.
In all likelihood, even the photo on the left was cropped in from full frame; very few news photos aren't cropped at least somewhat to tighten in on the important part of the image. But you can see how easy it is to take a photo from distance and bring the viewer right in close.
His arguement makes sense, I am impressed that he uses facts and logic, instead of simply hurling empty accusations.
Now Hindpocket's partner, Elephant Guy has his snout in a snit because the picture won a Pulitzer Prize for breaking news photography. He calls it a pulitzer for "felony murder."
One of the things I learned when I started my blog is that it is harder than it looks. That is, if you care about what you are saying. I would never think of making the kind of serious accusations that the Powerliners and numerous others have made on the flimsy "evidence" that they produce.