It builds up to Corker desire to go to the Senate to get spending under control. Now I would like to get spending under control as well, but I am far more concerned about the war in Iraq, the looming war against Iran, immigration, etc. He does address these issues in a superfical manner:
We must complete our mission in Iraq, supporting the new emerging democratic government until Iraqi forces are prepared to defend their country.Iran and North Korea pose exceptional dangers because of their possession of nuclear materials and our relations with these nations should be a top foreign policy priority. We must be firm in our insistence that Iran and North Korea renounce any nuclear weapons programs and we should stay focused on solving this problem in the near term.
Okay Sen. Corker, what if it takes another five or ten years to "complete our mission in Iraq"? Are you still game? Suppose Iran tells us to take our concerns about their nuclear program and stick them where the sun don't shine; do we bomb, invade, what? What do you have to offer other than platitudes?
And how can any Republican candidate talk about controlling spending with a straight face? If Republican control of the government for the last six years have led to exploding debt, I don't see Corker making much of a difference.
3 comments:
Well done!
[url=http://phmrezfn.com/gqih/zypw.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://ytgusrpd.com/riih/ctnn.html]Cool site[/url]
Thank you!
My homepage | Please visit
Well done!
http://phmrezfn.com/gqih/zypw.html | http://wjwowgqn.com/lmui/tabn.html
Post a Comment