Monday, December 05, 2005

In Defense of Dubya

No, he is not the worst president ever, but he still has three years.

8 comments:

Wirkman Virkkala said...

I'm no expert on Buchanan, but I don't consider him as bad as most historians do. Of course, most historians are mere cheerleaders of warfare. They see Lincoln as greatest, while I see him as tied for worst (Woodrow W. shares the dishonor, in my books). Buchanan let the South secede. That's not treason, as someone in the article suggests. That's just plain honorable good sense.

Wirkman Virkkala said...

Bush is merely on the FDR level of horrid.

But, as you say, give him time.

Clark said...

I can't decide if he is closer to Nixon or LBJ.

David Tomlin said...

Anyone who thinks the Dred Scott decision was about 'escapted slaves' is way too ignorant of American history to be writing articles about it.

Anonymous said...

Hello ##NAME##, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a postsuch as yours with a different topic completely to what I was looking for. It often ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

I tend to have a soft spot for blogs related to article websites and /or sites that have a central theme around article websites type items.

Once again, thank you, hope you don't mind if I visit again sometime :-)

Anonymous said...

Great work!
[url=http://qcnhprmp.com/nnwj/xgwr.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://dwlhurfl.com/ksxr/ptsm.html]Cool site[/url]

Anonymous said...

Good design!
My homepage | Please visit

Anonymous said...

Good design!
http://qcnhprmp.com/nnwj/xgwr.html | http://xsgdxgyb.com/hjba/xlgu.html