clark stooksbury

I'm no expert on Buchanan, but I don't consider him as bad as most historians do. Of course, most historians are mere cheerleaders of warfare. They see Lincoln as greatest, while I see him as tied for worst (Woodrow W. shares the dishonor, in my books). Buchanan let the South secede. That's not treason, as someone in the article suggests. That's just plain honorable good sense.
 

Bush is merely on the FDR level of horrid.

But, as you say, give him time.
 

I can't decide if he is closer to Nixon or LBJ.
 

Anyone who thinks the Dred Scott decision was about 'escapted slaves' is way too ignorant of American history to be writing articles about it.
 

Hello ##NAME##, I find it very refreshing to occasionally find a postsuch as yours with a different topic completely to what I was looking for. It often ads to ones list of lifes experiences.

I tend to have a soft spot for blogs related to article websites and /or sites that have a central theme around article websites type items.

Once again, thank you, hope you don't mind if I visit again sometime :-)
 

Great work!
[url=http://qcnhprmp.com/nnwj/xgwr.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://dwlhurfl.com/ksxr/ptsm.html]Cool site[/url]
 

Good design!
My homepage | Please visit
 

Good design!
http://qcnhprmp.com/nnwj/xgwr.html | http://xsgdxgyb.com/hjba/xlgu.html