tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8602934.post115982890374882261..comments2024-01-27T02:17:16.331-05:00Comments on clark stooksbury: Limbaugh . . .Clarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04496378286694267020noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8602934.post-1159980955834193692006-10-04T12:55:00.000-04:002006-10-04T12:55:00.000-04:00Rush is a liberal, there's no way around it. If th...Rush is a liberal, there's no way around it. If this was 1933 he would be in full roar in support of the New Deal. It doesn't take much to covert a New Dealer into a neocon because all they're all social democrats in the end, just to varying degrees. Look at Ronald Reagan, look at Irving Kristol now look at Limbaugh, even though he comes from a family of Republican flunkies. His hatred of liberalism basically comes from he fact that they now inherit to old GOP/ conservative belief in human nature which he never shared in. He's an FDR optimist by God and when that transition of optimism went over to Reagan, so did Limbaugh, because after all, it is all bout in the end, the contest between the gloomy people and the happy people. Thanks for the Larison link because it does clarify his thinking or lack of it.Sean Scallonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05752105081262429547noreply@blogger.com